The Anti-Bar Association

Dedicated to:

1. the abolition of the American Bar Association or any other organization of similiar function by any other name, ridding the courtrooms of members of the Bar.

2. prevention of 'attorneys at law', 'lawyers' and 'counselors at law' from holding ANY office, elective or appointive, or any position of employment or contract whatsoever in any branch of any known government in the known universe.

'Attorney at law' is herein defined as - Person admitted to practice law in his respective state and authorized to perform both civil and criminal legal functions for clients, including drafting of legal documents, giving of legal advice, and representing such before courts, administrative agencies, boards, etc.

'Counsellor at law' is herein defined as - An attorney; lawyer.

'Lawyer' is herein defined as - an attorney, counsel, or solicitor; a person licensed to practice law.

3. prevention of 'attorneys at law', 'lawyers' and 'counselors at law' from receiving any form of compensation whatsoever from any known government in the known universe.

4. dedicated to the abolition of any licensing requirements of any profession for the simple fact that 'licensing' is permission from the 'government' to break the 'law'.

US Constitution Article 1, Section 9, clause 8
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

The constitution states all branches shall be separate and it is a foregone conclusion that a person cannot be employed by but one of the branches. Being all attorneys are Officers of the court, even while in private practice, they cannot hold office in either executive or legislative branches, yet they do in contravention of the contract/bylaws, that being the constitution. Therefore they have circumvented the constitution and obtained a privilege that no other class of persons have and that is self evident.

North Carolina Constitution Article 1, section 34
Perpetuities and monopolies are contrary to a free state and will not be allowed.

Lawyers hold a monopoly on the judicial branch which by their privilege grants them. This special privilege, written by the way by lawyers, shows in the Third Article of the Constitution at Section 7 para. 7 which states; "Special Qualifications for Attorney General. Only persons duly authorized to practice law in the courts of this State shall be eligible for appointment of election as Attorney General." This precludes all others which it is stated is a "SPECIAL PRIVILEGE" A.K.A. title of nobility, even if it was for garbage collectors only.

North Carolina Constitution Article VI, Section 9
Dual Office Holding. (1) It is salutary that * * * the potential abuse of authority inherent in the holding of multiple offices by an individual be avoided.

Therefore, no person that holds any office or place of trust or profit under the United States or any department thereof, or under any state or government, shall be eligible to hold any office in this State that is filled by election by the people."

Now we have a gross violation of the both Constitutions when the judicial branch officers of the court, lawyers, are voted into office of legislator or executive. This no one can dispute that an officer of the court in the judicial branch cannot hold any other office in the other two branches as stated right in the constitution Article IV of N.C.

Big Al

IN CASE YOU DID NOT KNOW. One tends to forget the following and 90 percent of the people have no idea this exists. That is why the judge can tell the attorney to shut up and he has to follow the tyrant on the bench. That's why attorney's fear contempt charges when in all actuality there can be no contempt charge. But the judge is the boss in HIS court and his bar buddy, to whom he issued a certificate to practice, has to abide by whatever the judge decides is best for the employer, the State or the United States, because they pay his salary and god-forbid if he allows the bar buddy to present enough evidence to clear the man of, say a tax crime. They all know this to the last man. That's why a attorney can only represent you and will not argue wht you want him to argue and loves to plea bargain because that is a procedure that takes them off the hook because they can't argue law. Just think back for a moment and tell me what law was argued in the Simpson case or the Montana freemen case by the attorney.

Corpus Juris Secundum, Volume 7, Attorney and Client, Page 707;

First duty not to clients, "Counsel must remember that they, too, are officers of the courts, administrators of justice, oath-bound servants of society: that their first duty is not to their clients, as many suppose, but is to the administration of justice: that to this their clients' success is wholly subordinate; that their conduct ought to and must be scrupulously observant of law and ethics: and to the extent that they fall therein, they injure themselves, wrong their brothers at the bar, bring reproach upon an honorable profession, betray the courts, and defeat justice." US v. Frank 63 F.(2d) 123,129. reversed on other grounds Loughlin v. US 67 F.(2d) 1080. reversed on other grounds Pearse v. US 59 F.(2d) 518 In Re Kelly 243 F. 696, 705

Conflict of Duties "In case of conflict between attorneys duty to client and that to court, his duty to the court must prevail. State v. Barto 232 N.W. 553, 202 Wis. 329"

Big Al

The writer of this is I judge to be patriotic, eloquent, and willing to fight for our republic and against its enemies -- both foreign and domestic. But let me suggest the proper windmill with which to joust -- the PALs -- the Politically Arrogant Lawyers. If you are just now being informed of the results of my studies on the subject, please read some of these findings which nobody has refuted yet:

The lawyers in the 106th Congress, those sitting in office now, make up 56% of the Senate and 42% of the House; the lawyer-justices of the Supreme Court comprise 100% of that branch although it is NOT a requirement that they be lawyers; and lawyers make up about 75% of the Executive Department. This horrible conflict of interest which the voters have allowed has led to the theft of our "balance of power" by the PALs, and has negated almost every right, liberty, and protection we have had under our Constitution against judicial tyranny.

Please also ponder some other thoughts. It is innate that lawyers loathe any foe who can defend himself; and consequently they will try to disarm you by every method available to them, including the passage of laws to prohibit your owning firearms.

The writer calls ours a "Godless, perverted government", and that it is; but the voters who continue to vote for lawyers, beg for handouts, and believe the PALs when they claim they are doing such great things for the people, are the cause of their own problems. They, our fellow Americans, are voting for and encouraging the allowance of the perversion of our greedy, politically arrogant lawyers-in-government, and the rest of us are their unwilling victims. They who continue to vote for election and re-election of lawyers to the House and Senate are pitiable products of the fascist public education system of the United States, and they are the political and mortal enemies of the patriotic citizens who wish to preserve our nation as the bastion of freedom which it was ordained to be.

It seems that those of us who have served our country in various ways to preserve the Republic are outnumbered. The Politically Arrogant Lawyers in the three departments of government -- the Legislative, the Executive, and the Judicial -- have managed to get us on the ropes. They have bought illegal votes with our money through phony "entitlements", they have subjected otherwise intelligent citizens to virtual slavery by their "minimum wage" enlargements, and they have intimidated millions of them with their famous threatening "three little words", "I'll sue you."

When my great-grandfather George Evans and his brother Richard served in the North Carolina Militia in the War of the Revolution, they were part of the 3% or so who actually fought to establish this country. If I could only get 3% of the men of this country to join with me in GLOOPO, "Get Lawyers Out Of Public Office", the war to throw off the shackles of the PALs and save the United States, I believe we could be successful.

It is discouraging, but then at times I get indications that people are waking up to the dirty tricks of the lawyers, and we might be successful after all.

Al Evans

*In the back of Black's Law Dictionary (published by WEST Publishing in St Paul, Minnesota) is the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, THE TIME CHART OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT (1789-pub date), THE ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, AND --- AND the ONLY -- TABLE OF BRITISH REGNAL YEARS from William I [the Conqueror] of 1066!!!!

Glen Stoll

"Due process requires that litigant claim be heard by fair and impartial fact finder…" PORTER v. SINGLETARY, 49 F3d 1483 (11th Cir. 1995). "Judges must not only be scrupulously fair in administration of justice, but must foster an aura of fairness." U.S. v. BROOKS, 145 F3d 446 (1st Cir. 1998); "Judge is required to disqualify himself if a reasonable person would have a rational basis for questioning his impartiality…" Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847 (1988).

Anyone who walks into ANY COURT in the country has a "[r]ight to a fair trial [that] is [a] basic requirement of due process and includes right to an unbiased judge." HAUPT v. DILLARD, 17 F3d 285 (9th Cir. 1994). Denying a fair trial denies DUE PROCESS. In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955); see also Ward v. Village of Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57 (1972). "Justice must satisfy the appearance of Justice." Murchison, quoting Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14 (1954); because "…fundamental unfairness is at war with due process." LISENBA v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 314 US 219; see also Murchison "Our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness."; Mayberry v. Pennsylvania, 400 U.S. 455, 469 (1971) so that "[t]he appearance of even-handed Justice . . . is at the core of due process."

"[W]hen a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974). Also, "[w]henever a judge acts where [he/she] does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821). If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), [he/she] is without jurisdiction, and [he/she] has engaged in an act or acts of treason.

To impose a burden upon an average citizen that ignorance of the law is no excuse, who is not versed or skilled in matters of the law, and then to afford a judge immunity for improper actions gives rise to tyranny and a usurpation of the power and authority of the Supreme Law of the Land. For a judge by nature and virtue of the oath, responsibility, training, and obligation of their position are assumed to know the law. Director, OWCP v. Perini North River Associates , 459 U.S. 297, 103 S.Ct. 634, 74 L.Ed. 2d 465 (1985); Procunier v. Navarette, 434 U.S., at 562. Conferring immunity on the judiciary, or ignoring complaints as so many judicial review boards do, gives rise to so many little tyrannical dictatorships under color of law.

"... [J]udicial verbicide is calculated to convert the Constitution into a worthless scrap of paper and to replace our government of laws with a judicial oligarchy." Senator Sam Ervin


"To be governed, is to be watched, inspected, spied, directed, law-ridden, regulated, penned up, indoctrinated, preached at, checked, appraised, sized, censured, commanded; by beings who have neither title nor knowledge nor virtue.

To be governed is to have every operation, every transaction every movement noted, registered, counted, rated, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, refused, authorized, indorsed, admonished, prevented, reformed, redressed, corrected.

To be governed is, under pretext of public utility and in the name of the general interest, to be laid under contribution, drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized, extorted from, exhausted, hoaxed, robbed; then, upon the slightest resistance, at the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified, annoyed, hunted down, pulled about, beaten, disarmed, bound, imprisoned, shot, mitrailleused, judged, condemned, banished, sacrificed, sold, betrayed, and, to crown all, ridiculed, derided, outraged, dishonored."

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon

If we could replace the American Bar Association with nothing... would that be just fine with you?

The Anti-Bar Association is an international organization created by Freedom-loving people from around the world, who are not happy that various Bar Associations around the world have dominated and monopolized their court rooms.

Founded on August 20, 2000, to replace the American Bar Association, and all of their associated power structures, and associated costs in many terms such as money, lives, and Freedom, the Anti-Bar Association offers an international forum for occupied, oppressed people who currently struggle to regain their lost Freedom and Lawful courtrooms, and preserve and protect all of their God-Given Rights and economic Rights and safeguard their homelands.

Anti-Bar Association ACTIVITIES

The Anti-Bar Association does not represent people; it assists and empowers them to represent themselves more effectively. To this end, the Anti-Bar Association provides much needed professional services, education and training in the fields of diplomacy, international and God-given Rights Law, true Republic processes and institution building, Common Law education, Libertarian education, conflict management and resolution and environmental protection. Assistance by the Anti-Bar Association enhances activities by Free Independent Nations of Earth.

By encouraging governments around the world to break up the Bar Association's monopolies in the courtroom's and make this one basic change in their legal systems, major tyrannies and imperialist nations around the world should begin to feel surrounded. Hopefully, they will come out with their hands up.


Many groups turn to violence out of frustration at the refusal or inability of the international community or particular governments to listen, let alone respond, to their concerns. By demonstrating the effectiveness of non-violent strategies and actions, Anti-Bar Association members hope that their organization may succeed in reducing the use of violence throughout the world.


The costs of running an organization such as Anti-Bar Association can be very high, and the founding members do not have the means to support it on their own. Although the staff is all-volunteer, operating costs are still considerable. Members, private foundations and individuals are welcome to finance its activities. In the long run only a solid base of individual supporters can assure the Anti-Bar Association's continued existence.


Struggling in isolation is very painful. The knowledge that other peoples are going through similar experiences and that there are people throughout the world who know about your plight and who care, is of immeasurable importance.

The Anti-Bar Association egroup provides this support. Through the Anti-Bar Association eGroup we can develop activities in support of our God-Given Rights and the aims of the Anti-Bar Association.

"The judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working under ground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric. They are construing our constitution from a co-ordination of a general and special government to a general and supreme one alone." -- Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), Letter to Thomas Ritchie, December 25, 1820.
"The Constitution ... is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape into any form they please." -- Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), Letter to Judge Spencer Roane, September 6, 1819.

The Anti-Bar Association
22 W. Bryan St., # 353
Savannah, (31401) Republic of Georgia

Won't you please consider joining other freedom-loving people today?

Subscribe to freedomconstitutions
Powered by


Bar Association History & Who Owns the U.S.
Anti-Bar Association Freedom Constitutions egroup
Free Independent Nations of Earth
The Anti-Federalist Society
The Good Samaritan Telephone Tree
Corrupt Lawyer Photos
Exposing Legal Corruption
Google Search Query: Corrupt Lawyers
Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission
Tracking the scent of corruption
HOW LAWYERS Are Taking America To Hell In A Hand Basket
Legal Justice Reform Network
Mega Links in Criminal Justice
Courts Without Justice
Citizens for Legal Responsibility
Constitutional Guardians
A Woman Suing Judges and Lawyers in Georgia
State of Georgia's Judicial Qualifications Commission
People Before Lawyers
Legal Documents
Rich's Page
Advanced Trial Handbook
AntiShyster Guerrilla Lawfare
The Missing 13th Amendment
The Missing 13th Amendment
Justice Delayed is Justice Denied
Washington State Court Rules - Admission to Practice Rules (APR)
The National Center on Elder Abuse
Elder Law Resources
Family Caregiver Alliance
Judicial Watch
The "Bar" Treaty of 1947
Calhoun Report
JAIL 4 Judges
South Dakota's Amendment E
Americans for Legal Reform
Carolina Advocates for Legal Reform (CALR)
The National Congress For Legal Reform (NCLR)
Divorced from Justice
Center for Judicial Accountability, Inc.
Citizens for Judicial Accountability, Inc.
Legal Justice Reform Network
Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse (CALA)
Texans Against Lawsuit Abuse
Consumer Advocates for Legal Justice
The National Legal Center for the Public Interest (NLCPI)
Ralph, evans' Complaint against the Texas Bar Association
Faye, Foster's Complaint against the Texas Bar Association
Halloween Greeting
Pro Initiative Websites
The Texas 3 Kick Rule
What is a Lawyer? by Glen Stoll
American Patriot Friends Network
Why Attorneys are not lawyers
TEXAS - COURTS versus "We The People"
The State of Texas isn't registered
Able Legal Forms Company
Florida's Judicial Branch Surrenders State Power to Private Professional Trade Union!
NOLO Lawyer Joke Emporium
The History of the Crown
Knighthood, Chivalry & Tournament Glossary of Terms
The British Orders of Chivalry
Committee For Judicial Ethics
Hiding Behind the BAR
What is a Lawyer?
Texas State Bar Act is Unconstitutional
Lawyeratrocities News
History of the Federal Judiciary
A legal notice concerning the requirements for the licensing of an attorney in California.
Lawyer Jokes
Stop Bad Justice
Legal Reform
Victims of Law
Attorney License Fraud
Bar Associations
Finding of Fact: True 13th Amendment
Legal System vs. Law System
Unlicensed Practice Of Law
Do Idaho Attorneys Have a License to Practice?
Famous Non-Attornies
Satanic Crown Temple Attorney
Do You Need A License to Practice Law?
Part of The Answer to Larry Becraft's Treatise on "BRITISH ACCREDITED REGISTRY" is the fact that Americanized English common law, where ALL CRIME IS AGAINST THE 'GOVERNMENT', is in substance, crown law. In addition, the federalized system under the U.S.Constitution destroys many proper attributes of a proper nation that should be exercised by each state instead of controlled by the government in Washington, D.C., such as the attribute of properly emitting bills of credit instead of this being monopolized by the international banksters, and also each state would rightfully retain its own war-making decision powers. Whether the BAR originally stood for 'British Accredited Registry' or not is really becoming a matter of research of little practical value because members of the BAR are actually participating in substance in our subjugation, not merely by name. It really doesn't matter what the BAR or 'British Accredited Registry' is called because attorneys have stolen from the People the control of the government in all three or more of its branches and have hoodwinked the People into subjugating themselves into U.S. citizenry and servitude when in truth once our grandparents kicked out King George, we didn't have a government at that moment in time and we all became equal with each other. Consequently, the attorneys, the masons, and other secretive society members who are loyal to the system of crown law imposed upon the People of this land actually have no right to force their system of feudalism upon the People of the Posterity of 1776.
The State Bar of California: What Does It Do? How Does It Work?

gene karl
anti-bar association anti-federalist
and student of Eric WhoRUbr>

From: Jim Townsend Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:12 AM Subject: J.A.I.L. for Judges!!! Hello Ron, I do not know who John is. I understand that you are working to remove the unlawful privately owned British Accreditation Regency 'legal system' from the law courts of your country. The same people that have enslaved you enslave us as well, the major difference being that, unlike you, we never have been a free people. At least you people had about three weeks of real freedom in your history, before the legal system got you back into the trap. Though I admire the approach you take, it is not practical here in Canada as our entire government is far too corrupt. What we are concentrating on is preparing cases to bring the Inns of Temple Court, the private clubs that own the 'legal system franchise' that is imposed on us, to the LAW COURTS at Westminster, where they are at their absolute peril. In the 'legal gaming courts' here in Canada, all we can do is play the part of the fish while the Justice Department, which owns Revenue Canada, play at shooting fish in a barrel. It does not matter what the case is in Canada, the only sure winner is the court system that collect fees from both parties. I have Hansard notes from the House of Lords dating back to when Canada was 'patriating' it's Constitution in 1982, where they are laughing at our gullibility, but conceding that the reason we are so stupid is because our fathers were also deceived before us and as a consequence have no idea what the true nature of the deceit is. Since this unlawful 'legal system' has been imposed in all countries that are "Constitutional Monarchies" (a serious contradiction of terms) we are trying to motivate people in Scotland, Ireland, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand to do the same. It would be wonderful if a group of Americans would also launch a class action suit against the people in Britain that own this private legal system franchise, in their own Law Courts, that have imposed this deception in our various countries. They are guilty of crimes against humanity and need to be brought to Justice. 'Legal' and 'Lawful' are two different things. In the distinction between the two, lie the basis of this great deceit. I no longer look for definitions of anything anywhere except in Black's Law Dictionary. Please check my definitions for yourself. Lawful contemplates the spirit of the law. It is the substance of our law system. It is predicated upon the morals and ethics of the state (the people) who live in a given geographical area. Legal simply means it is written down someplace. 'Legal' means the letter of the Law. It is quite possible for something to be 'legal' and totally UNLAWFUL. All of our law courts in North America have been overthrown and replaced with a legal court system. Lawyers are all members of the 'British Accreditation Regency'. In other words, they have sworn allegiance to a foreign power. This is why lawyers only ever talk about what is legal and not what is lawful. Lawyers are given the British Title of 'Esquire'. An squire is a shield bearer. British Titles are given out for service to the British Crown. (The British Crown by the way, is not the Monarch, but a legislative body of bankers and lawyers from Fleet Street where these Inns of Temple Court exist.) Ever wonder what service G.H.W. Bush or Mayor Giuliani rendered to the British Crown to become Knights of the British Empire? Do you know how many people holding top positions in your own government are Knights of the British Empire? Does it not bother you people that those you have elected to authority in your country have sworn allegiance to a foreign power? Isn't that treason? It is time we ripped the disgusting rag from the eyes of Justice so she can see to wield her divine sword of Justice against these criminals. I really like the fact that you people are working so hard to exacerbate the plans of these global dominators, but it would sure be nice if you were chopping at the roots of the problem rather than just trimming all the branches. If you are interested in what it is that I am saying, I can send you copies of my book; "Freedom! Canada" and a number of brochures, which explains much of how the British have deceived us here in Canada. I do not have my book online anymore as, once again, my web site has been closed. I keep losing service providers for "spamming", even though all I do is send political messages to elected officials and government employees. Wishing you all the best, my American cousins. Keep your chins up and fight the good fight. I have some links at that you may be interested in as well. Since I have had numerous hotmail email accounts closed as well, my number is 403-228-2798. Please contact me there if my I lose my ISP connection again or if they close this hotmail account. Cheers, Jim P.S. Do you know what the lawful definition of Free is? Look in Black's Law Dictionary... Free: Not subject to the legal constraints of another. (Isn't that interesting.) Other definitions you should look at; State (the people in a given geographical area. We the people, are the state, not the government.) License (a permit to do something that would otherwise be illegal. It is illegal for you to own your own car or to drive it on the highway without getting a license from the British Crown?) Constitution (the body of law, written by the people, for regulating the government. So why are our governments playing with our Constitutions? Why are the foxes writing the rules for the hen house?) Free people are self governing. We do not elect governments to govern us. We elect governments to govern the civil service. Perhaps if we made our politicians wear janitor uniforms, they would understand their place in society and would understand that we are electing EMPLOYEES, NOT LEADERS. More likely though, they already understand this and it is WE THE PEOPLE that need to come to this realization. "The nation that wishes to remain IGNORANT and FREE, wishes for what never was, and never will be." Thomas Jefferson Jim Townsend Custom Visual Basic Programming

NOTICE - All information found on this website is designed to provide accurate and authorative information in regard to the subject matter covered in it. It is displayed with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering 'legal' opinions. (In other words, the American Bar Association can kiss our big toe.) We are not attorneys, we are anti-attorneys, doofus!