Subject: Reasons to Get US Out of the UN
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 07:44:57 -0500
From: John Jones <trinityfarms@mindspring.com>

If you get more than one of these messages please let us know 
and pass this information on along with teaching our people the truth!

>A Dozen Good Reasons to Get US Out! of the United Nations
>More and more Americans are coming to the chilling realization that U.S.
>membership in the United Nations poses a very real threat to our survival as
>a free and independent nation. Here are some good reasons to be concerned:
>
>1. The UN's basic philosophy is both anti-American and pro-totalitarian. Our
>Declaration of Independence proclaims the "self-evident" truth that "men ...
>are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights." But, in its
>Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the UN ignores God's existence,
>implies that it grants rights, and then repeatedly claims power "as provided
>by law" to cancel them out of existence. If any government can place
>restrictions on such fundamental rights as freedom of speech, the right to
>keep and bear arms, freedoms of the press, association, movement, and
>religion, soon there will be no such freedoms.
>
>2. The UN was founded by Communists and CFR members whose common goal was a
>socialist world government. Sixteen key U.S. officials who shaped the
>policies leading to the creation of the UN were later exposed in sworn
>testimony as secret Communists. These included Alger Hiss, chief planner of
>the 1945 founding conference, and the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury,
>Harry Dexter White. The Soviet Union under Stalin and the entire Communist
>Party USA apparatus worked tirelessly to launch the UN. Since its beginning
>in 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has always worked for world
>government. The key CFR founder, Edward Mandell House, in his book, Philip
>Dru: Administrator, called for "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx ..." The
>CFR was an early promoter of the UN, and 43 members of the U.S. delegation at
>the UN founding conference were or would become CFR members.
>
>3. The UN has always chosen socialist one-worlders for leaders. The
>Secretary-General at the UN founding conference was Soviet spy Alger Hiss. He
>was followed as Secretary-General by Norwegian socialist Trygve Lie, Swedish
>socialist Dag Hammarskjold, Burmese Marxist U Thant, Austrian former Nazi
>Kurt Waldheim, Peruvian socialist Javier Perez deCuellar, and Egyptian
>socialist Boutros Boutros-Ghali. Each has consistently used the full
>resources of the UN to promote Communist and socialist causes around the
>world. The Socialist International (which proudly traces its origins to the
>First International headed by Karl Marx) today claims tens of millions of
>members in 54 countries. At its 1962 Congress, it declared: "The ultimate
>objective of the parties of the Socialist International is nothing less than
>world government ... Membership of the United Nations must be made universal
>..." Almost all of the UN's "independent" commissions for the last thirty
>years have been headed by members of the Socialist International.
>
>4. The UN seeks power to control the environment, population, children ...
>the world. Both the 1972 UN Environmental Program and the 1992 UN Conference
>on Environment and Development laid plans to whip up widespread environmental
>concerns (some exaggerated, many completely fabricated). These concerns would
>then be used as justification for increasing UN authority on environmental
>issues. The statements and publications of these UN programs leave little
>doubt that their goal is a world government with the power to cancel national
>sovereignty, regulate economic activity, and control the human race all, of
>course, under the banner of "protecting the environment." In late 1994, UN
>planners meeting in Egypt approved a 20-year, $17 billion plan to "stabilize"
>the world's population. The UN's goal is to reduce population selectively by
>encouraging abortion, sterilization, and controlled human breeding. The UN
>Convention on the Rights of the Child also claims power not only to grant
>rights but also to cancel them "as provided by law." It claims that
>governments must guarantee children "freedom of expression ... freedom to
>seek, receive, and impart information ... freedom of thought, conscience, and
>religion," regardless of the wishes of their parents.
>
>5. The UN Charter outlines the path to world tyranny. After giving lip
>service about not intervening "in matters which are essentially within the
>domestic jurisdiction of any state ...," the UN Charter continues, "but this
>principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under
>Chapter VII." Chapter VII discusses sanctions and boycotts, but if these are
>decided to "be inadequate, it may take such action by air, sea, or land
>forces as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and
>security." The UN used this broad assertion of authority as the pretext for
>its armed intervention in the domestic turmoil in Somalia and Haiti.
>
>6. The UN is building its own army to enforce its will. In 1992, UN
>Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali, fulfilling a directive from the UN
>Security Council, unveiled An Agenda for Peace, a plan to strengthen UN
>"peacekeeping" capabilities. The plan calls for armed forces to be made
>available to the UN "on a permanent basis." It ominously warns, "The time of
>absolute and exclusive sovereignty has passed" and proceeds to name a long
>list of "risks for stability" that would be used to justify use of the
>"permanent" UN army to enforce its will. Incredibly, U.S. leaders are using
>America's military to pave the way for this UN army. In Bosnia, Somalia,
>Haiti, and elsewhere, foreign UN commanders have controlled our troops. When
>15 Americans were killed over Iraq in mid-1994, Vice-President Gore extended
>condolences "to the families of those who died in the service of the United
>Nations." Even more incredibly, it has been the official policy of the U.S.
>government since 1961 to disarm America and create a UN army. This policy
>concludes: "progressive controlled disarmament would proceed to the point
>where no nation would have the military power to challenge the progressively
>strengthened UN Peace Force." (See State Department publication 7277: Freedom
> From War.)
>
>7. The UN doesn't settle disputes - it makes them worse! Our ambassador to
>the UN in 1982, although a UN supporter, admitted, "The UN has become an
>arena in which countries are drawn into problems they might never have become
>involved in." Ask yourself: Should Seychelles or Benin or Guyana or Barbados
>have to take sides in a clash that breaks out on the opposite side of the
>world? When centuries-old animosities erupt in the former Yugoslavia, why
>does the UN inject its presence with troops, blockades, bombing, and a parade
>of speeches? American troops serving as globocops for the UN become targets
>for criminals and terrorists. In 1983, 241 U.S. Marines were blown to bits at
>the Beirut airport. Five years later, a U.S. Marine Lieutenant Colonel was
>kidnapped and eventually murdered by Arab terrorists while in a UN unit in
>Lebanon (he was unarmed - as required by the UN). The UN "peacekeeping
>mission" in Somalia cost the lives of another 36 Americans in 1993.
>
>8. The UN ignores Communist atrocities but targets non-Communist nations and
>leaders. When Soviet tanks rolled into Hungary in the 1950s, when the Chinese
>Communists were murdering Tibetans in the 1960s, when the Soviets were
>butchering civilians in Afghanistan in the 1970s and 1980s, when Chechnya was
>brutalized by the Russians in the 1990s, the UN did nothing! But the UN
>declared tiny Rhodesia "a threat to international peace" in the 1960s,
>enabling pro-communist terrorist Robert Mugabe to seize power. And it was a
>UN-led campaign that brought self-described Communist and convicted terrorist
>Nelson Mandela to power in South Africa in the 1990s.
>
>9. The UN embraces Communist China - history's most murderous criminal
>regime. In 1949, anti-Communist Nationalist China, one of the UN's founding
>members, was forced from the mainland to Taiwan by the Communists. In 1971,
>the UN expelled Taiwan and embraced the brutal Red Chinese government - a
>government responsible for over 35 million murders. When the vote admitting
>Red China was announced, UN delegates danced in the aisles to show their
>contempt for America and their joy at the triumph of Red China.
>
>10. The UN is a moral cesspool filled with perverts and fat cats. In 1993,
>the UN Economic and Social Council granted consultant status to the
>International Gay and Lesbian Association which includes the North American
>Man/Boy Love Association (advocates of child molestation) and the Dutch group
>Vereniging Martijn (which also promotes use of children as sex objects). In
>1988, the top Belgian UN Children's Fund (UNICEF) official was one of a group
>convicted of running a child sex ring. Moral bankruptcy is commonplace in UN
>operations. In Zimbabwe, UNICEF-donated equipment helped terrorists seize
>power. In Vietnam, the Communists received $13 million from UNICEF while
>untold thousands of boat people fled for their lives. Fat cats? UN employees
>are paid 40% more than comparable U.S. workers and some receive subsidized
>rent. An ex-UNICEF official confirmed that "pampered and cosseted staffs" of
>various aid agencies "absorb 80% of all UN expenditures."
>
>11. America supplies the money, the UN then finances tyrants and assorted
>enemies of the U.S., and conditions in the nations "aided" grow worse. U.S.
>taxpayers pay 25% of the UN budget plus 31% of the UN special-agency budgets.
>Additional billions of our dollars go to the IMF, World Bank, and other UN
>related lending agencies where they have been used for incredibly wasteful
>and subversive UN projects. (Not surprising since these agencies were
>designed by Soviet agent Harry Dexter White and Fabian Socialist John Maynard
>Keynes.) Socialist International spokesman Hilary Marquand aptly described
>the IMF as "in essence a Socialist conception." World Bank "aid" funds went
>to brutal Marxist dictator Mengistu while he was causing large-scale
>starvation and death in Ethiopia; to Tanzanian dictator Julius Nyerere as he
>drove peasants off their land and burned their huts; and to the Vietnamese
>Communists, sending thousands of boat people into the sea. Even Newsweek
>magazine concluded that the UN's foreign aid programs tend "to prop up
>incompetent governments or subsidize economies so they can never stand on
>their own."
>
>12. The UN is a war organization, NOT a peace organization. Article 42 of the
>UN Charter claims authority to "take such action by air, sea, or land forces
>as may be necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security."
>But the UN definition of "peace" is never given. Tyrannical regimes
>throughout history have defined "peace" as the absence of all opposition. To
>achieve "peace" in Katanga in 1961, UN planes bombed hospitals, schools,
>administrative buildings, and private homes. Katanga was an anti-Communist
>province of the Belgian Congo seeking freedom from the Communist-controlled
>central government. The UN is not now, and has never been, a peace
>organization. It will use whatever military power it is given to force all 
>nations of the world to submit.
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>------------------------------------
>Looking for what the Bible says about Christians and Civil Government? 
>Pastor John Weaver covers this and much more. Audio tapes are only $4.00 
>each. Just click: http://freedompage.home.mindspring.com/johnweaver.html
>
>

Blessings, John Jones

Trinity Farms International Ministry
P.O. Box 32190
Raleigh, N.C. 27622

919-787-2000
Fax-787-1025
trinityfarms@mindspring.com

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for
for good men to do nothing."  Edmund Burke (1729-1797)

www.mindspring.com/~trinityfarms

www.trinityfarms.org

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is believed that this information came from the John Birch Society. 
That may be true. They do have some good information.
I just believe that they don't go far enough to get us out of this mess.
-- gene karl