Dear Anti-Federalists:

These are my feelings exactly.
This is a very important message.
Even though I would rather revive the missing 13th amendment
or write new constitutions without legislatures
and bring back the Grand Juries
and Common Law Trial Juries, I really agree with what 
is being said here.
Far too many people are spinning their wheels with words.
We need to build a new framework of government, a 
real Republic if we want freedom.

please join in.
sincerely,
gene karl
              SIDE-TRACKED BY WORDS
                  (Response to JAIL Reader)
Dear James:
    I hope I'm not going to become embroiled in a nit-picking
debate with you by responding to your message below. Let me just
say that those who appear to be apologists for the judicial
system by pointing the finger at certain words, terminology,
phraseology, etc. are, in my humble opinion, doing a disservice
to those of us who are trying to find a solution to the real
problem-- establishing a system of accountability of the
judiciary to the People.
    Rather than be distracted by the term "pro se" or any other
legal jargon that may mean something other than what is intended,
or other than what is clearly evident from the facts and
circumstances taking place, my focus is on the general corruption
that is running rampant in our judicial system across this
country.
    There is no doubt that I am an individual, a nonlawyer, who
is entitled to due process of law as set forth on the books in
order to obtain redress of my grievances. The individual
(whatever he is called by legal jargon) doesn't get past the due
process (procedural) stage. The courts block him at the pleading
stage in violation of procedural law, disregarding the facts and
substantive law being claimed by the individual in his pleading.
(I won't even call him "plaintiff" for purposes of this
discussion, for fear of running into another terminology glitch).
    The individual nonlawyer is being routinely deprived of his
First Amendment (I won't say "right") protection of petition for
redress of grievances in our courts by arbitrary edict, without
evidence to support such edict. (The judge says it and that alone
makes it 'law'.) Words from a judge's mouth, or by the stroke of
his pen, doesn't ipso facto make it "law." But that's the way it
goes in our system today-- just sheer unbridled power that is
destroying our society. This shouldn't be happening in this
country!
    James, we have to get beyond "words." Let's deal with the
real problem. I didn't intend to say this much, and I hope I
don't regret it. There are a lot more words here for you to
parse, if that's your inclination-- and I hope not. There's a
much bigger problem controlling this country on which we, as the
People, (society in America if you will) must concentrate. Let's
not get side-tracked.

Ron Branson - subscribe or remove > ron1@access1.net
www.jail4judges.org - America's last and ONLY hope!
JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY INITIATIVE LAW.
JAIL crosses all political party lines and will
become this nation's hottest issue - bar none!
Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, N. Hwd., CA 91603

"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather
an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in
people's minds.." --Samuel Adams               <><