Several years ago we tracked down what appears to be a "little-known" fact about credit extended via the Federal system: The only true security a bank or mortgage company has is mortgage insurance. The property financed does not secure the loan. In all cases, the borrower pays for mortgage insurance, and in the event he is unable to pay the debt, the financial institution has recourse against the insurance. It takes a Philadelphia lawyer to figure it out, but if you study Regulation Z (12 CFR § 226) and follow leads from there, you can unravel the maze. The borrower, in the event he is unable to pay, has the right to rescission. Anyway, about two weeks ago Gail sat with her son-in-law at an Enid hospital while her oldest daughter had surgery. While they were shooting the breeze, she told Wayne about the mortgage insurance thing. Normally he isn't too attentive to law subjects, but he must have picked up something in the course of that particular conversation. Last weekend while he was at his National Guard weekend, one of his longtime friends was down in the mouth. The guy suffered a work-related injury about six months ago and has missed work, as well as Guard meetings, for most of that time. Due to the financial broadside, his home was at the brink of foreclosure. Wayne recited what Gail told him about mortgage insurance. Monday the guy marched himself into the mortgage company and informed them to collect on the mortgage insurance in order to catch payments up. The guy was so excited when he called Wayne that Wayne didn't recognize his voice and had to ask who the caller was. Evidently the mortgage company account officer completely changed disposition when the guy requested relief via the insurance policy. "Oh, we forgot about that," was the supposed excuse. "We will take care of it. Don't worry about a thing." Technically, fraud is the only reason a bank, if it had standing, could foreclose a mortgage. The insurance is available for the eventuality of default regardless of cause other than fraud. The irony is that the guy who made it work doesn't know anything about law. He's a working Joe who so far as I know doesn't have anything to do with the patriot community. When he heard that he had been paying for the mortgage insurance since taking the mortgage (banks and mortgage companies never give you a copy of the policy), he bellied up to the bar and demanded to collect on it. In other words, he spontaneously did what I've been thinking on off and on for the last several years and was successful because he had the confrontation before the situation got to the point of foreclosure litigation. I would suggest that people who have mortgages request copies of mortgage insurance policies from the financial institution or the insurance company. You pay for it, you just as well know how to collect on it. Dan Meador