http://user.icx.net/~drherb/fringe.html
Fringe On The U.S. Flag What Does It Mean?
Admiralty Courts in Colorado?
Patriots are subjected to much ridicule when they object to [Admiralty
flag] the flag that appears in every government office and courtroom in
the land. That flag is the United States flag... with one seemingly
minor cosmetic difference - a knotted golden fringe on three sides.
Government officials and judges adamantly refuse requests to remove the
gold fringed flag and replace it with the constitutional flag of the
United States as defined in 4 U.S.C. Section 1,2, and 3 - which has NO
fringe.
Why should anyone be concerned about this apparently innocent
decorative feature? What difference does it make?
The difference is that the flag that is displayed is legal notice, to
all who enter, of the type of law that holds jurisdiction. The
constitutional United States flag signifies common law jurisdiction.
The gold fringed United States flag is the Admiralty or War flag which
denotes Admiralty or martial law.
Hogwash, you say? Is there no Admiralty Court claiming jurisdiction in
America except in matters that occur on the high seas? Think again!
Just as the founders of this country railed against the King for
extending Admiralty law to the lands of the Colonies, so are those few
patriots who have paid attention to the corruption of our legal system,
raising a hue and a cry over the current usurpers of jurisprudence.
Rocky Mountain News
Wed. May 22, 1996 Legal Notices Section
The legal notices here displayed concern property seized by Federal
agents as booty under Admiralty law. Notice is required so that anyone
who might have an interest in the property seized has opportunity to
seek to protect his interest.
One would not be wise to attempt this, though. Most likely, any excuse
will be used to allege that the party claiming interest in the property
was a party to the alleged offense that resulted in the original
seizure.
The allegation is enough to justify the taking of property - under
Admiralty law guilt is presumed. The claimant might well lose other
property not yet in the hands of these landgoing pirates, even though
no actual conviction of any offense is ever entered. Check your local
paper's legal notices. Look into the cases cited and see if any
conviction occurs - or if any charges were even filed - against the
persons whose property was seized.
Colorado is a long ways from the ocean. Admiralty law is farther still
from the common law recognized under Federal and State constitutions.
You decide... are these patriots kooks? Or have we been blind to the
tyranny that is even now upon us?
More Evidence on the Flag Issue
Our official courts today are all operating under admiralty
jurisdiction, except the court of Claims in Washington D.C. which
remains under the common law...You can easily identify an admiralty
court by noting the presence of a gold fringed flag in the court room.
This is a military flag which denotes admiralty jurisdiction within
that court...
" Sizes and Ocassions for Display
National flags listed below are for indoor display and for use in
ceremonies and parades. For these purposes the United States flag will
be rayon banner cloth, trimmed on three sides with golden fringe, 2.5
inches wide. It will be the same size as the flags displayed or carried
with it.
Aurthorization for indoor display.
Each military courtoom." Army Regulation 840-10, October 1 1979
Admiralty and Maritime, Military Law
The Law of Pirates, The Law of the "Other United States" the
corporation.....
The Territorial (District) United States operates under absolutist
"Military and Maritime Law. Originally, this law was only applicable on
the open seas and waterways, but it was brought inland for the subject
citizens of the Possessions, Territories and ceded lands Belonging to
the United States.
According to U.S. Code. Title 18 ß 7. Admiraty Jurisdiction is
applicable to the following areas:
1. The High Seas 2. Any American Ship 3. Any lands reserved or aquired
for the use of the United States, and under the exclusive or concurrent
jurisdiction thereof, or any place purchased or otherwise aquired by
the United States by consent of the legislature of the state......
The following information is taken from 34 Opin Atty Gen, pg 34
(Opinions of the Attorney General) under the catagory of "The
President," the flag is discussed as follows:
"The only statute now in force which defines the flag or regulates its
design is the Act of April 4, 1818, Chapter 34 (3 Stat, 415), reenacted
as sections 1791 and 1792 if of the revised statutes of the United
States. Section 1791 provides that, " the flag of the United States
shall be thirteen horizontal stripes, alternate red and white, and the
union of the flag shall be thirty-seven stars, white in blue field."
Section 1792 provides that "on the admission of a new State into the
union one star shall be added to the union of the flag., and such
addition shall take effect on the fourth day of July then next
succeeding such admission."
Note that there is no statutory authority for the "yellow fringe around
the flag."
The use of such a fringe is prescribed in current Army regulations, No.
260-10 The yellow fringed flag is therefore, a "Military Flag".
Under the Admiraty Law of Flags (12 C.J.S. ß 12), a ship owner gives
notice, by his flag, to all who enter that he intends that the law of
the flag will regulate. The person entering into agreements therein,
must either submit to the law of that flag or not contract..If your've
ever left a courtroom feeling that you had been to a court martial
rather than a court of law this is the reason...Don't be deceived by
the pretty yellow fringe, it is your warning that you have submitted
yourself to the rule of the master, and are under the juridiction of
that flag. If you enter a courtroom and enter a plea in the presence of
a military flag, you have acquiesced (consented without protest) to the
federal military jurisdiction. It is your warning that you are leaving
the majority of your fundamental rights, as protected by the
Constitutional at the door.
"It is an elementary rule of pleading, that a plea to the juridiction
is.. a tactic admission that the court has a right to judge in the
case, and is a waiver to all exceptions to the
jurisdiction."......Court case (Girty v. Logan, 6 Bush Ky. 8)
Always challenge the jurisdiction of a court. These courts rule on
"Public Policy" rather than the Law, and can only decide whether or not
proper legislative procedures were adhered to......
JOHN J. DOE......your name in all capital letters....What does it mean?
Law about Nom De Guerre ( War Name ) is in the Public Laws of the
Seventy Third Congress Of The United States... 1933...........
More about your Name go toYour Name
Read the following court cases
(Burks v. Lasker, 441 US 471)& (U.S v. Grimaud 220 US 506) The issue of
Jurisdiction.You will learn that when jurisdiction is not squarely
challeged it is presumed to exist...In the courts there is no
meaningful opportunity to challege jurisdiction, as the court merely
proceeds summarily. However once juridiction has been challeged in the
courts, it becomes the responsibility of the plaintiff to assert and
prove said jurisdiction..(Hagans v. Lavine, 415 US 533) as mere good
faith assertions of power have been abolished.(Owens v. City of
Independence, 100 SCt, 1398, 1980)
They must prove that you agreed in a lawful contract to be subject to
their coporate stautes...This works for all statues when their has been
no damaged party, no damaged property or person no crime
commited......as set forth under the common law.....reserving your
rights under the Uniform Commercial Code.... UCC 1-207 without
prejudice....is very important, you must understand its meaning. and
use it at all times when you sign your name on any and all documents..
It states ("The sufficiency of the Reservation: any expression
indicating an intention to reserve rights is sufficient, such
as"without prejudice" UCC 1.207.4) and
(" The making of a valid Reservation of Rights preserves whatever
rights the person then possesses, and prevents the loss of such rights
by application of concepts of waiver or estoppel,"UCC 1-207.7) and
( "When a waiveable right or claim is involved, the failure to make a
reservation thereof, causes a loss of the right, and bars its assertion
at a later date."UCC 1-207.9.....)
UCC 1-103.6 "The Code is complementary to the Common Law, which remains
in force, except where displaced by the code.
A statute should be contrued in harmony with the Common Law, unless
there is a clear legislative intent to abrogate the Common Law."
....The UCC is what they must abide by...All States signed under the
UCC...If they choose to ignore it... you can SUE any government
official for violating your rights guarenteed under the UCC...
Lawyers cant do for you in a court of law that you can do for
yourself.. They have restrictions... For they would risk losing their
status of being able to practice law...
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." Benjamin Franklin,
1759
"For in a Republic, who is 'the country?' Is it the Government, which
is for the moment in the saddle? Why, the Government is merely a
servant - merely a temporary servant; it cannot be its prerogative to
determine what is right and what is wrong and decide who is a patriot
and who isn't. Its function is to obey orders, not originate them." -
Mark Twain
More Information, Go To
FACTS, Jurisdiction & The United States
The Right To Contract
Back To Information Links Page Health Information Page Main Page