Black Confederate display banned Politically-correct Army censored 'tasteful' historical' exhibit By Jon E. Dougherty © 2000 WorldNetDaily.com Thur. March 9, 2000 An Army post has forbidden a retired officer from displaying Civil War-era historical memorabilia of black Confederate soldiers, claiming the display is offensive, even though it was set up to honor Black History Month. Ed Kennedy, a retired Army lieutenant colonel who taught history at the Army staff college for three years and now lives near Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, said he is perplexed by the order to remove the display from the post's Command and General Staff College. According to Kennedy -- who is white -- the display was created to honor, not demean, blacks and to educate people who might not have known that many blacks indeed served willingly as southern soldiers. Kennedy said in order to prevent hurting anyone's feelings, his group -- Sons of Confederate Veterans -- purposefully decided not to place a Confederate flag in the display, even though it dealt with a Confederate theme. The display, erected on Jan. 30 but covered by superiors with brown paper by Feb. 1, was based on "a lot of research, going through books, many of them by black authors, detailing the lives of black Confederate vets," noted Greg Freeman, a columnist who wrote about the incident in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. "They also transcribed historical documents and included photographs of some of the vets. The tasteful display also included Civil War-era bullets and bayonets." Kennedy and his group works closely with another group, Sons of Union Veterans, made up of descendants of Union soldiers. No mention was made as to whether the Union group participated in the Leavenworth project, but "the groups sometimes work together decorating graves, among other things," Freeman said. Kennedy said when he tried to find out why the display was covered, Army college officials gave him "the runaround." Initially, he was told someone had filed an official complaint about the display, only to find out later that claim was false. Then, said the retired officer, he was told the display offended the college's commanding officer, Col. Stanley Evans, who had ordered it covered up. Kennedy tried to get a meeting with the officer but was repeatedly delayed. On Feb. 5, word came that Kennedy would have to remove the display, on Evans' orders, because U.S. Army Chief of Staff Gen. Eric K. Shinseki would be visiting the college and Evans didn't want him to see it. "The decision to censor and remove the display was made before anyone would even meet with us to talk about it," Kennedy told the Post-Dispatch. Finally, the college commander agreed to meet with Kennedy, telling him the display was removed because it lacked "balance." The retired officer explained that the display was intended to showcase black Confederate soldiers and that it was not appropriate to add references to black slavery as Evans suggested. "That would have been fine, but not as part of this display," Kennedy said. The retired lieutenant colonel also said he explained to Evans that the display was historically accurate -- based on voluminous supportive research -- and was in no way intended to demean, malign or otherwise insult blacks. Evans said he would study the issue of allowing Kennedy to put the display back up and said he would be in contact. But the call never came. After some time had passed, Kennedy decided to re-contact Evans, only to find out he had retired. The new commander, Col. John Moilanen, knew nothing of the issue and Kennedy decided not to approach him with it. "By then it was too late to do anything, plus Col. Moilanen was new in the position, so it would have been unfair to ask him to make a quick decision without knowing what had gone on," Kennedy said. The retired Kennedy has since filed a complaint with the base inspector general and with the base Equal Opportunity Employment office. An Army spokesperson at Leavenworth, Janet Ray, said the display had been removed because "there were complaints." "Those who complained felt the display didn't give the full perspective of blacks' experiences in the Civil War," Ray said. Though she said she knew blacks had served as soldiers for the Confederate Army, Ray said, "we'd like the Confederate group to maybe work with the black officers and figure out a better way to make the presentation in the future." Kennedy said Ray's comments were the only ones he received as well. "We'd love to work with the black officers or anyone else, and we'd be glad to make a presentation to anyone who'd like one," he said. However, he added, he wishes someone from the Army would have told him that, especially during the month of February. "I think they were just hoping we would go away," Kennedy said. "We were censored -- but not on something that was inaccurate, but on something factual, honoring those blacks who fought in the Confederacy." Related stories: Southerners fear loss of heritage, culture Jon E. Dougherty is a staff reporter for WorldNetDaily.